Missing: one word
Dec. 18th, 2007 06:34 pmI require a word which means "causes or is caused by". I suspect the English language does not possess such a word. This is a great trial to me in the process of writing an essay about a bunch of stuff for which we don't know which direction causation operates. Mostly I'm explicitly stating the causal ambiguity, and sometimes I say things like "is related to", but it's all very annoying.
(Essays continuing after official deadline because I was ill last week and have an extension. I fully expect to be writing essays forever, and never to reach Christmas.)
Edited to add: essay is finished :-) I will read through tomorrow to fix the inevitable bits where it doesn't make sense, but other than that: one down, one to go!
(Essays continuing after official deadline because I was ill last week and have an extension. I fully expect to be writing essays forever, and never to reach Christmas.)
Edited to add: essay is finished :-) I will read through tomorrow to fix the inevitable bits where it doesn't make sense, but other than that: one down, one to go!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 06:59 pm (UTC)Dratted English language :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 07:05 pm (UTC)Dratted indeed :-)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 07:49 pm (UTC)(Can't help with the word thing)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:37 pm (UTC)Although I suspect what you really need is to be writing in (by/with/from) Latin.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:50 pm (UTC)It's "linked with" in that sentence that is the bit I want to replace, although actually it's fine there, because in that case I do need to make explicit that I know we don't know which way round it is; there are other cases when I don't need to say it over and over again, but the absence of a word to precisely replace the concept means I feel like I'm belabouring the point.
(No! Please don't make me write in Latin! I'm having a hard enough time already this semester producing intelligent and coherent things to say without having to write them in a language I don't know! ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:56 pm (UTC)How Sapir-Whorf is this section? *has come back from office party, and is fuzzy with words*
Also, I know 0 Latin, so you're probably better off than me anyway....
Correlate, or versions thereof?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:05 pm (UTC)Oh yes, very.
How Sapir-Whorf is this section?
Not at all - it's psycholinguistics, so practically science ;-) Sapir-Whorf, IIRC, is more sociolinguistics.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:23 pm (UTC)I can't think of anything other than "correlate". I ask the DPhil in the house, and he will think about it. I may come up with something in sleep.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:49 pm (UTC)Though yes, this sounds more like Locke &c to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:59 pm (UTC)Umm, "interdependent" or possibly "codependent"? Though they sort of imply not havong one without the other.
"causatively linked" is true, but not exactly elegant.
"connected" is maybe a bit weak but would make a change from "linked".
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:03 pm (UTC)"Interdependent" is great, thank you - the implication is actually an appropriate one.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 09:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 09:44 am (UTC)Nah, I don't know of a word for it in another language. Which isn't really surprising, since the only other language I know more than about ten words in is French, and I've forgotten most of that. Still, I've finished the damned thing now, so presumably I managed to come up with something!