This afternoon's shopping trip with
blondeccgirl culminated in the purchase of acres of beautiful silk dupion (that slightly bobbly silk - cruelty-free since it involves the death of no silkworms, according to M). It's scarlet shot with purple, so it mostly looks darkish red, and slightly shimmery. I have a small piece of it beside me as I type, and it's very lovely indeed. The trip was especially fun for seeing the slight double-take of the sales assistants on realising this was for a wedding dress, not a bridesmaid's dress: it seems that getting married in a colour other than white or ivory is still quite unusual.
secretrebel - there was also some rather gorgeous chiffon with embroidered butterflies, and I would have bought you some if it hadn't been £35 a metre. Sorry ;-)
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-01-25 12:28 pm (UTC)But you eat meat.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-25 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-25 09:26 pm (UTC)I mostly agree, but if the line is wobbly instead of straight (as I guess mine is), then the question is raised as to whether much meaning can be ascribed to it.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-25 09:54 pm (UTC)Not wearing fur, for example, is very easy indeed, whereas not wearing leather is rather harder (which is, I guess, why many vegetarians wear leather: quite an inconsistency, but a reasonable one IMO). Even if your assessment of the 'badness' of leather and fur is the same, I think it's reasonable to have them on different sides of the line. Silk's somewhere in between, so it's in a bit of a grey area for me, but, as you say, I eat meat, so wearing silk doesn't constitute a great inconsistency.